Garland Roofing Lawsuit

Beware tremco roofing lawsuit all school district attorneys should know this and advise your district accordingly.

Garland roofing lawsuit.

We understand the unique challenges that come with owning managing and designing buildings and we can be there every step of the way. Bid rigging vertical price fixing horizontal price fixing. Jorge garcia of cedar hill ran house of tomorrow roofing company that left almost 100 homeowners probably many more without roofs. Subsequently they are responsible for creating a scam that overcharges by 50 some higher some a bit lower.

While t k had the lower bid the. The injunction against garland roofing enjoined them from committing bid rigging collusion vertical and horizontal price fixing unfair or fraudulent business practices as well as unfair deceptive untrue or misleading advertising and commercial bribery. For those of you who don t know it a garland rep who was a former tremco rep according to the garland regional sales manager got caught along with the company a contractor and two individuals in a los angeles area school roofing bid and had an injunction placed against them for. School roofing scam without garland and tremco so called explanations.

The bid did not use garland products. Los angeles district attorney garland consent order april 1 1997. Garland s metal solutions combine watertight integrity aesthetic versatility and intelligent sustainability to meet the widest possible range of functional and aesthetic requirements. Was the lowest qualified bidder at 89 550.

It may be old news but history is important. In west contra costa unified for example a recent roofing project at richmond high school went out to bid specifically requiring garland roofing projects. Garland s high performance building products and world class services are founded on more than 120 years of experience solving customer problems. Normally the scam is a purchasing cooperative tremco or garland a willing administrator who is neither credentialed experienced or know a single thing about modern roofing technique.

It appeared to be a clear case of. A lawsuit says the company took insurance money from customers. Before voting to accept academy or t k s bid the board discussed its concerns over the supervision of the project. Academy s bid was 96 890 and contemplated the use of garland products.

I will apologize to my readers in advance because this is extraordinarily tedious. I think i became officially blind reading it myself.